6 reasons George Best is massively overrated.

March 31, 2017


Image: Strettynew.com


George Best is overrated. We all know the would be legend of George Best, we've all seen him play and we've all seen his skills. I'm not writing here to suggest Best was a bad player, or indeed anything other than a pretty good player, maybe tending toward a little on the average side. I want people to understand that when you hear the name George Best mentioned alongside Cruyff, Pele, Maradonna, Beckenbauer and Zidane, that it's a massive disservice to those names and huge marketing myth that Manchester United have worked hard to create.


1. All we have are the highlights.


George Best is overrated because you'll never ever get to see the games where Best didn't show up. Or was marked out of the game. The games where the morning cigarette didn't get him going quite enough or the partying the night before never quite shook out of his system. You just get the goals. Why would they play anything else? But this is exactly the problem when you compare players of today, even the ones not lauded as all-time greats, against the so called best. We see Pirlo having off games for Juventus. We see Suarez marked out of the game against Bayern. We're comparing a career with a highlight reel. It gives a really false sense of a player compared to the best players of today.


Image: Pinterest



2. George Best is overrated because the game was easier then. 


Name me a top player that smokes these days? Or carries on the way Best did? Look at the physique of the top players of today and compare them to Bobby Charlton and John Giles. It's quite simply a different game. In the time of George Best you were up against guys from industrial working class backgrounds, who enjoyed a pint of bitter and the pipe, probably loped into the game in their late teens and kept up the same lifestyle. Games were nowhere near as physically demanding, tactically complex or as regular as they are today. Defences have improved, players are faster, they sprint train, they weight train, they spend all day perfecting technique. They're plucked as young as 6 by places like Ajax and dedicate their whole lives to football. Best was playing against a bunch of amateurs by comparison. It's an old argument, yes, but it holds up.


3. The stats. 


Best scored 239 goals in 604 career club games. It's a very impressive stat. But only 137 of those were scored for Manchester United. Outside of his United career, Best played for a slew of joke teams in lower leagues who basically were there to prop up his lifestyle. 54 of his goals came for the mighty San Jose Earthquakes. 33 of those were scored playing indoor football. 28 for the L.A. Aztecs. Hibernian, Fort Lauderdale and Fulham number among his other career / lifestyle choices and from 1982 to 1984 he played for 7 different teams, Sea Bee, Hong Kong Rangers, Bournemouth, Brisbane Lions, Osbourne, Nuneaton Borogh and Tobemore United, scoring in all 2 goals. George Best is overrated.

Compare his stats to some of the stats knocking around today:

  • Luis Suarez: 248 goals in 364 games
  • Edison Cavani: 201 goals in 363 games
  • Sergio Aguero: 212 goals in 401 games
  • Gonzalo Higuain: 209 goals scored in 358 games
  • Robert Lewandowski: 201 goals scored in 336 games
  • Christian Vieri: 194 goals scored in 375 games

All of these goals scored at top level. I could go on here, but I think the point is made. There are so many players in the last 20 years whose goal to game ratio is miles ahead of Best. I've even left off the 2 most obvious players, who are simply on another planet.







Image: The 42.ie


4. All the players since who have been better.


There have been so many. Yet Best's name is still the one bandied around with Maradonna, Pele, Eusebio and the rest. We know why. It's simple nostalgia. Listen to these names. Players who have been provably better but never seem to get hoisted up onto the select plinth of all-timers. I'll ignore all the guys I mentioned in the previous point, who definitely all count too.

Figo, Rivaldo, Totti, Weah, Maldini, Baresi, Laudrup, Romario, Baggio, Cannavaro, Batistutua, Xavi, Iniesta, Ronaldinho, Hagi, Crespo, Riquelme, Bergkamp, Henry, Platini. Again, I'm only stopping myself out of exhaustion. I could name names from many different countries across many different eras. Rui Costa, Alexis Sanchez, Raul.

George Best is massively overrated and not even in the same league as those guys!



5. Best isn't even rated outside of Britain & Ireland. 


Seriously. Talk to people on the continent. Or South America. They'll all inevitably go, 'Yeah, Best was a good player... but this guy...' and go on to name someone from their own country. It's simply what people do. I've had so many conversations with Italians about how Baggio is the greatest player of all time. It's a widely held opinion there. How many people do you think holds that opinion here? Who thinks Muller is the greatest forward of all time? So many people in Germany do. You see in football you have your heroes.  In Britain, they never really produced a really great player. They hype up a whole lot of guys, Gazza, Rooney, thugs like that. But none of them ever quite cut it. t's one of the great disasters of English football that they've never produced an Englishman even as good as Best, let alone the names I've been reeling off here. So, they latch on to a Northern Irishman and mention him whenever the conversation comes round to the greats.

6. The whole thing is a Manchester United marketing ploy. 


It really is. Once again. How many truly all time great players have played for what is supposedly the greatest and most popular team of all time. One. Ronaldo. And even then, he left immediately when he found his greatness, knowing it was simply too small a team for his talent. Look at the players who've played for Ajax, Bayern, Real Madrid, Milan, Barca and Juventus. All the greats have plied their trade there. United needed to hype up Best just so they could say they once had a great player. They worked and worked on his image. They sold posters and made documentaries. They did up replica shirts. Statues, songs and t-shirts. In the pantheon of hugely overrated United players, Cantona, Giggs, Beckham, Scholes, Robson etc, Best was made the king. They took the number 7 shirt and made a thing of it because of him, trying to claw their way into history with the big European sides aforementioned. It's a poor man's show. It's embarrassing. It's typical United. George Best is overrated.








You Might Also Like

11 comments

  1. 1. The game was easier - yes for everybody, including defenders who often used very agressive tactics against the opposition.

    2. What evidence do you have that George Best smoked?

    3. Both Pele and Maradona have remarked on the skill of George Best. Google it, I don't expect you to take my word for it.

    4. Best was considered the greatest player in Europe for a brief period in the late 1960s. You can list all the players he was compared with at the time, it will include Eusebio,Beckenbauer and Cryuff -

    http://www.football-history.net/european-footballer-of-the-year/1968.htm

    5. Best did not play as a striker, unlike Suarez, Aguero, Higuain.

    6. We only have the highlights of Best because of the period in which he played. The same can be said for any player of that period.

    7. Try again with some real arguments!

    ReplyDelete
  2. 8. Your argument about his scoring statistics also seems misguided. His goal per game ratio at United was 1 goal every 2.35 games. When he left United it dropped to 1 goal every 2.96 games (according to the data on his Wikipedia page). So his goalscoring suffered as a result of leaving United.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 9. I appreciate that your smoking argument referred to the players around Best and not Best himself, but that only reinforces my first point, that as a result of general fitness levels the game was easier for anyone who took fitness seriously. Best was a chronic alcoholic and achieved his status despite missing training sessions, late nights before games and playing with high levels of alcohol in his bloodstream.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sick of people from Northern Ireland raving about him in the same terms as real footballers who play/ played against real opposition. Oh his 6 goals against Northampton, how pitches were terrible then how he did so much of what he did when drunk. Very good but not the Best.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can't believe some of the nonsense in the overrated argument. I'm a Leeds fan and have no love for Manchester United but hey George Best was one hell of a player – one of the best in European football during his very short heyday in the late 60s, early 70s. He wasn't a striker so why stupidly compare him to Aguero, Suarez, Higuain and the like. He was a winger, who could dribble, a great header of the ball, and not only could he score goals but he did his defensive duties too. The great players of the day raved about him – Pele, Beckanbaeur, Eusebio and the like so no offence Mr Critic how high is your footballing credibility compared to theirs. As for other unknown couch critics who said he didn't play against 'real opposition'. Paul Reaney, Tommy Smith, Norman Hunter, Ron Harris and Dave Mackay were not cardboard cut outs!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unless you have seen him live you Won t get it all this ball juggling stuff you see people do he did all that when the players came on the pitch before the game they don't do kick around now

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pelè good, Maradona better, George Best

    ReplyDelete
  8. Best was a great player but also massively overrated. From 1963-1974 he was named player of the year only once in 1968. This speaks volumes. Also,never took the n.ireland team and singlehandedly even got them to the world cup. Maradonna not only did this but led his team to world cup victory in 86. I think the good looks and the 5th Beatle image as well as playing for man Utd have helped sustain this GOAT myth even to this day. Go and look at his stats they are far from impressive. To even mention him in the same bracket as maradonna Messi and Ronaldo is embarrassing. Garrincha who led Brazil to glory in 62 was a better dribbler and twice the player. Finally out of every world poll on who is the GOAT he has never once been voted 1st. In fact in the majority of them he was not even in the top 10

    ReplyDelete
  9. Of course Best is overrated. A legend has been woven around him due to his good looks. He had a talent but comparing him with Pele, Maradona, Messi etc is ridiculous. At his peak it must be remembered he was playing with World Cup winners and also Dennis Law. He was surrounded by quality. But I must pick you up when you say there has never been a great player from the British Isles. What about John Charles, Stanley Matthews, Jimmy Greaves?

    ReplyDelete

Popular Posts

Like us on Facebook

Flickr Images